What did you think of the book's structure, alternating between Roseanne's story and Dr. Grene's? Did you find one more compelling than the other? Does that structure work?
I was a little dubious about the structure to begin with. It took me a little while to warm to the doctor, but once I got into the rhythm of it I enjoyed it. It was incredibly intricate, when you think of it, telling a story that way, with shifting, interweaving narrative.
I fell in love with Roseanne's voice first, before I realized their similarities, and her plight was so engrossing that I'd have to say I found her narrative more compelling, but I was terribly fond of him, too, the way he looked at life, his extraordinary humility, and in the end their voices were inseparable to me.
I had a similar experience. Early in the book I found myself wanting to hurry through Dr. Grene's sections to get back to Roseanne's story. After a while, though, he won me over with his humility and compassion, and I thought the two stories wove together beautifully.
2 comments:
I was a little dubious about the structure to begin with. It took me a little while to warm to the doctor, but once I got into the rhythm of it I enjoyed it. It was incredibly intricate, when you think of it, telling a story that way, with shifting, interweaving narrative.
I fell in love with Roseanne's voice first, before I realized their similarities, and her plight was so engrossing that I'd have to say I found her narrative more compelling, but I was terribly fond of him, too, the way he looked at life, his extraordinary humility, and in the end their voices were inseparable to me.
I had a similar experience. Early in the book I found myself wanting to hurry through Dr. Grene's sections to get back to Roseanne's story. After a while, though, he won me over with his humility and compassion, and I thought the two stories wove together beautifully.
Post a Comment