Tuesday, April 24, 2007

"C" correct vs. careless

Fisher also uses “C” to point out that cook with the right books and references, whose sauces follow a reputable recipe to a science, and assigns them the dubious title of “Cautious.” Don’t you think that’s applicable to people in a lot of arts and skills? They take a mechanical approach to learning about art or music or another subject like they’re studying for a final exam where there are only some “right” answers, which don’t take their own tastes into account.

Or you have people who profess an interest in a subject but learn nothing about it. Did anybody see Woody Allen’s “Hannah and her Sisters” and remember the artist who was irate that some rock musician wanted to buy something to complement his furniture?

Ben is a great example of how not to be either. He knows a tremendous amount about music but will tell people exactly what he likes or doesn’t like without worrying about what they think, because he’s confident in his own taste. I could envision him critiquing Beethoven or Bach when most people would be too cowed by what they’re told is “good” to speak up. And if he didn’t know much about another subject, he would just say so rather than bluff his way through a conversation.

I’m getting away from the book, here, but think it’s applicable -- a “correct” host just isn’t as much fun. They have their own party but don't trust their own tastes to please friends.

4 comments:

Erin said...

Interesting. Yes, I think this perfectionist phenomenon occurs in a lot of areas. People striving so hard to do things "right" that their end product lacks any soul or fun.

Ben said...

Thank you for putting my negativism in a positive light, cl. I really should be more positive about music and other things.

cl said...

Oh, no. You're not negative about it, and I didn't mean it that way. I like how you're decisive about your musical tastes.

Ben said...

I know you didn't mean it that way, cl. But kc and Erin would say that -- they each think I'm too negative. And I think I agree with them.

So I guess what I meant is thank you for seeing something good in a negative trait of mine, even if you don't think of it as negative.